WEKO3
アイテム
Thurgood Marshall の死刑違憲論 : 死刑と世論をめぐる「マーシャル仮説」を出発点として
https://doi.org/10.15057/0002061039
https://doi.org/10.15057/0002061039fe8cce3b-6da6-4730-a47c-19faed4e1c29
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hogaku0240206070.pdf (1.8 MB)
|
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-10-16 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Thurgood Marshall の死刑違憲論 : 死刑と世論をめぐる「マーシャル仮説」を出発点として | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Thurgood Marshall’s Argument on the Unconstitutionality of the Death Penalty : The “Marshall Hypothesis” Concerning the Death Penalty and Public Opinion | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
岡田, 聖貴
× 岡田, 聖貴
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 論説 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper examines Justice Thurgood Marshall’s hypothesis concerning the constitutionality of the death penalty and public opinion, and also his entire argument on the death penalty. The Supreme Court of Japan appears to have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty by referring to public sentiment. In Furman and Gregg, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall discussed the relationship between the constitutionality of the death penalty and public opinion. The argument is known as the Marshall Hypothesis:(1）the public knows very little about the death penalty, and（2）when provided with information, they would find it unacceptable and unconstitutional. After reviewing the changes in attitudes toward the death penalty among three Justices through their experiences on the Supreme Court, this paper argues that guaranteeing the potential for change through information disclosure is a prerequisite for appealing to public opinion. In fact, Marshall’s argument for the unconstitutionality of the death penalty was not primarily based on public opinion, but rather emphasized the importance of procedural protections, including the right to effective assistance of counsel. However, his argument is consistent in demanding a reasoned judgment based on the facts and information regarding the death penalty. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 一橋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 日付 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2025-08 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| selfDOI | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15057/0002061039 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1347-0388 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1161370X | |||||||||
| 収録物名 | ||||||||||
| 収録物名 | 一橋法学 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 巻 | ||||||||||
| 巻 | 24 | |||||||||
| 号 | ||||||||||
| 号 | 2 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 607 | |||||||||
| 終了ページ | ||||||||||
| 終了ページ | 646 | |||||||||
