ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. Research & Education Resources
  2. 030 Department Bulletin Papers = 本学紀要論文
  3. *一橋法学 = The Hitotsubashi journal of law and international studies
  4. 24巻2号(2025.8)

中国の被疑者取調べにおける弁護人立会権の必要性・再論 : 第四回刑事訴訟法改正を契機に

https://doi.org/10.15057/0002061025
https://doi.org/10.15057/0002061025
c0e9aafa-c3b8-4c6d-b912-d5cf339d218c
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
hogaku0240201550.pdf hogaku0240201550.pdf (1.7 MB)
Item type デフォルトアイテムタイプ(フル)その2(1)
公開日 2025-10-16
タイトル
タイトル 中国の被疑者取調べにおける弁護人立会権の必要性・再論 : 第四回刑事訴訟法改正を契機に
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Revisiting the Necessity of the Defense Attorneysʼ Right to Be Present During Interrogations of Suspects in China : On the Occasion of the Fourth Amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law
言語 en
作成者 方, 海日

× 方, 海日

ja 方, 海日
河南財経政法大学

en FANG, Hairi

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 葛野尋之先生 名誉教授称号授与記念
言語 ja
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the necessity of the defense attorneysʼ right to presence during interrogations in criminal proceedings in China. Since the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Law in 1979, Chinaʼs judicial practice has been dominated by the inquisitorial mode of investigation under the framework of authoritarianism and investigation-centrism, severely constraining the rights of criminal suspects and defendants. Within this procedural architecture, the lack of effective checks on investigative power has led to frequent unlawful interrogations, such as extorting confessions through torture. From the 1990s to the early 2000s, a series of major wrongful convictions, in particular capital cases, were exposed, revealing the systemic deficiencies of the centrality of investigation, and prompting profound reflection on the standardization of the interrogation process in both academic and practical circles. Through three rounds of criminal justice reform, although the protection of the rights of the accused – centered on the right to defense – has been strengthened, the leniency system for the admission of guilt and the acceptance of punishment established by the 2018 legal amendments has devolved into a catalyst for a confession-centered doctrine in practice. This not only erodes the accusedʼs right to voluntary statements but also heightens the risk of wrongful convictions and undermines the foundation of judicial fairness. Resolution of this dilemma hinges on establishing the defense attorneysʼ right to presence during interrogations. This right would effectively restrain illegal investigative practices and provide real-time legal support ; it would also ensure timely access to case information and optimize defense strategies and ultimately fulfill the constitutional commitment to effective defense. The ongoing fourth-round amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law urgently requires drawing on international criminal justice standards to codify and institutionalize the defense attorneysʼ right to presence during interrogations, while ensuring its effective implementation through supporting mechanisms.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 一橋大学大学院法学研究科
言語 ja
日付
日付 2025-08
日付タイプ Issued
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
selfDOI
ID登録 10.15057/0002061025
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1347-0388
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA1161370X
収録物名
収録物名 一橋法学
言語 ja
巻
巻 24
号
号 2
開始ページ
開始ページ 155
終了ページ
終了ページ 176
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-10-16 08:55:21.693989
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3