WEKO3
アイテム
Measuring the Effect of Infant Industry Protection: The Japanese Automobile Industry in 1955-1965
http://hdl.handle.net/10086/16967
http://hdl.handle.net/10086/1696797b689f9-76b1-41ad-b665-cb9a88fe324d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
070econDP06-23.pdf (190379 bytes)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-05-20 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Measuring the Effect of Infant Industry Protection: The Japanese Automobile Industry in 1955-1965 | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
西脇, 雅人
× 西脇, 雅人
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | March 26 2007 | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University | |||||||||
| 日付 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2007-03 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 関連情報 | ||||||||||
| 関連タイプ | isPartOf | |||||||||
| 関連名称 | Discussion papers ; No. 2006-23 | |||||||||
| ページ数 | ||||||||||
| ページ数 | 26 | |||||||||
| 抄録（第三者提供不可） | ||||||||||
| 値 | This paper examines the Japanese automobile industry to measure the effect of import restriction policy for infant industry. Import restriction policy can provide large amount of domestic demand for producers and help them to acquire the experience of production. It has been said to be a key driving force of the dramatic growth of the Japanese automobile industry. Compared with a subsidy policy, however, an import restriction causes some types of distortions. Conducting the counterfactual exercise, I explore what it would have happened if instead the optimal subsidy had been provided to Japanese automakers. This exercise measures the welfare effect of an actual restriction policy in terms of an optimal one. That is, it quantifies how close the welfare level of the actual policy was to the level of the optimal subsidy policy. From the experimental exercise, I find the fact that the import restriction reached to only 55 percent of the optimal welfare level. | |||||||||
