WEKO3
アイテム
オランダにおける「持続可能性イニシアチブの可能性に関する法律案」の法的構造
https://doi.org/10.15057/71603
https://doi.org/10.15057/716037aa6da62-2970-4cd2-917b-dd79d4837727
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hogaku0200101830.pdf (1779084 bytes)
|
|
| Item type | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2021-04-09 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | オランダにおける「持続可能性イニシアチブの可能性に関する法律案」の法的構造 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | The Legal Structure of the Proposed Room for Sustainability Initiatives Act in The Netherlands | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 作成者 |
柳, 武史
× 柳, 武史 |
|||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Recently, the Netherlands faced an obstacle of competition law assessment regarding sustainability initiatives which were intended to achieve certain sustainability goals. Under the cartel regulation, agreements which bring about marginal consumer disadvantages in addition to significant sustainability benefits are prohibited. To solve the tension between competition policy and environmental policy, the Dutch government proposed the Room for Sustainability Initiatives Act to the parliament. This article analyzes the contents of this legislative proposal as follows. First of all, relevant ministers decide whether the proposed sustainability initiatives are in line with “public interest” by, for example, utilizing social cost-benefit analysis（SCBA）so that consumer benefits and sustainability benefits are equally balanced. However, SCBA is a complicated method, and there are almost no legislative precedents with full-scale SCBA. Second, under this legislative proposal, as a competition authority, the Authority for Consumers and Markets（ACM）has the power to issue an opinion regarding the market effects of proposed sustainability initiatives. However, given the ACM’s limited authority to price, quality and consumer choice, the ACM does not advise the desirability of proposed sustainability initiatives. Third, there are also arguments from the perspective of the principle of sincere cooperation under Article 4（3）of the Treaty on European Union. | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 一橋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||
| 日付 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2021-03-10 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| selfDOI | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15057/71603 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1347-0388 | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1161370X | |||||
| 収録物名 | ||||||
| 収録物名 | 一橋法学 | |||||
| 巻 | ||||||
| 巻 | 20 | |||||
| 号 | ||||||
| 号 | 1 | |||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||
| 開始ページ | 183 | |||||
| 終了ページ | ||||||
| 終了ページ | 209 | |||||
