ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. Research & Education Resources
  2. 010 Journal Articles = 雑誌掲載論文
  3. 015a 経済研究 = The Economic Review
  4. 72巻1号 (2021.1)

The Economic Consequences of the 2018 US-China Trade Conflict: A CGE Simulation Analysis

https://doi.org/10.15057/71062
https://doi.org/10.15057/71062
9add9136-9c8b-4732-a6ae-2f0275a587b7
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
keizaikenkyu07201001.pdf keizaikenkyu07201001.pdf (1.3 MB)
アイテムタイプ デフォルトアイテムタイプ(フル)その2(1)
公開日 2021-02-01
タイトル
タイトル The Economic Consequences of the 2018 US-China Trade Conflict: A CGE Simulation Analysis
言語 en
作成者 Tsutsumi, Masahiko

× Tsutsumi, Masahiko

en Tsutsumi, Masahiko

Cabinet Office

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper aims at evaluating the economic consequences of the 2018 US-China trade conflict. The potential impact of the proposed tariff increases is calculated using a global CGE model. Capital deepening and technological spillover induced by trade are also taken into account to explore the longrun influence. We can derive the following implications. First, the additionally imposed tariffs on goods alone decline the GDP in the US and China by 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The equivalent variation in the US and China is reduced by 9.8 billion and 35.2 billion USD, respectively. Although other countries gain from trade diversion, losses exceed gains globally. Second, considering the effect from capital deepening and technological spillover induced by trade makes the situation worse. The GDP in the US and China declines by 1.6% and 2.5%, respectively. The equivalent variation in the US and China is reduced by 199.5 billion USD and 187.1 billion USD, respectively. Again, the trade diversion is not large enough to recover losses in these countries. Third, the imposed tariffs distort relative prices, resulting in changes to the global production structure. Both the US and China lose their comparative advantage in transport, electronic, and machinery equipment production, while other countries expand their production in these sectors. Finally, Chinaʼs retaliatory tariff increase worsens the US economy to some extent, but it comes at a cost to the Chinese economy. In the long run, retaliation is not an appropriate policy response.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 岩波書店
日付
日付 2021-01-22
日付タイプ Issued
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
selfDOI
ID登録 10.15057/71062
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 00229733
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00070761
収録物名
収録物名 経済研究
巻
巻 72
号
号 1
開始ページ
開始ページ 1
終了ページ
終了ページ 19
JEL
値 F13
JEL
値 F17
JEL
値 F51
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-18 03:09:49.971377
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3