WEKO3
アイテム
EU指令の「逆直接効果」に関する近時の判決からみた指令の直接効果の発展の方向性（2・完） : Viamex Agrar Handel & ZVK 判決およびPortgás 判決を中心に
https://doi.org/10.15057/27851
https://doi.org/10.15057/27851aaebfe7e-647c-4e1b-946e-b6f14705cdd3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hogaku0150103750.pdf (1892097 bytes)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-11-07 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | EU指令の「逆直接効果」に関する近時の判決からみた指令の直接効果の発展の方向性（2・完） : Viamex Agrar Handel & ZVK 判決およびPortgás 判決を中心に | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Recent Judgments by the Court of Justice of the European Union on the “Inverse Direct Effect” of Directives and their Implications on the Future Development of the Court's Jurisprudence (2) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
柳生, 一成
× 柳生, 一成
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In the Viamex case and the Portugás case, the Court of Justice has recognized that State authorities can rely on the provisions of EU directives against undertakings before the national court, although the Court had long prohibited the “inverse direct effect”, that is, State authorities' relying on the provisions of directives against individuals, including private undertakings. Whereas the Court's explanation on the consistency of two rulings with the case-law is very succinct, did the Court implicitly re-evaluate the theoretical underpinnings of the prohibition of the “inverse direct effect” ? Do those judgments foreshadow the further change in the case-law on the direct effect of directives ? Will the Court recognize the horizontal direct effect between private parties, which it has been consistently rejecting, based on the same reason as those of the “inverse direct effect” ? This contribution compares the past judgments with those judgments and proves that the Court is not likely to bring radical change to its case-law on the direct effect of directives in the foreseeable future, although the Portugás judgment added new development to the case-law. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 一橋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||||||
| 日付 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2016-03-10 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| selfDOI | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15057/27851 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1347-0388 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1161370X | |||||||||
| 収録物名 | ||||||||||
| 収録物名 | 一橋法学 | |||||||||
| 巻 | ||||||||||
| 巻 | 15 | |||||||||
| 号 | ||||||||||
| 号 | 1 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 375 | |||||||||
| 終了ページ | ||||||||||
| 終了ページ | 395 | |||||||||
