WEKO3
アイテム
アメリカの集団的労使関係法における熟議民主主義 : 被用者自由選択法案を題材として
https://doi.org/10.15057/27412
https://doi.org/10.15057/27412dae82aa8-95f4-4340-aff5-6aab3d03a6bd
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hogaku0140207730.pdf (1914683 bytes)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-11-07 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | アメリカの集団的労使関係法における熟議民主主義 : 被用者自由選択法案を題材として | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Deliberative Democracy in American Labor Law : An Analysis of the Debate on the Bill of the Employee Free Choice Act | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
藤木, 貴史
× 藤木, 貴史
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In the United States, it has been difficult for a trade union to become an exclusive bargaining representative due to many obstacles in the process for organizing a union. In order to remove such obstacles, the bill of the Employee Free Choice Act recently attempted to add some provisions, including what is called the “Card-Check” provision, to the National Labor Relations Act. This paper clarifies the grounds on which the bill was criticized by its opponents and justified by its advocates through an examination of their debates regarding it. My analysis reveals that the arguments presented by both sides were based on the same idea of political science, “deliberative democracy”. Opponents of the bill emphasized the fact that the Card-Check provision would degrade the deliberative and democratic process in the workplace by potentially allowing trade unions to abuse their power and by preventing employers from providing valuable information to their employees. Advocates, on the other hand, stressed four factors regarded as essential in political science, namely, efficient information, autonomy, continuation, and deliberation. In doing so, they asserted that the bill would (1) ensure that employees received more useful information, (2) enable employees to be more autonomous, (3) make it easier to create a new democratic and continuing organization within the workplace, and (4) encourage employees to deliberate democratically. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 一橋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||||||
| 日付 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2015-07-10 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| selfDOI | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15057/27412 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1347-0388 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1161370X | |||||||||
| 収録物名 | ||||||||||
| 収録物名 | 一橋法学 | |||||||||
| 巻 | ||||||||||
| 巻 | 14 | |||||||||
| 号 | ||||||||||
| 号 | 2 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 773 | |||||||||
| 終了ページ | ||||||||||
| 終了ページ | 844 | |||||||||
