WEKO3
アイテム
関係的権利論における応答の概念 : 「他者」としての子どもの人権論
https://doi.org/10.15057/28964
https://doi.org/10.15057/2896453f24048-d74e-4255-9643-d6e319b48901
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hogaku0160302090.pdf (1981885 bytes)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-11-07 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 関係的権利論における応答の概念 : 「他者」としての子どもの人権論 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Responsiveness in Relational Rights Theory | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
大西, 健司
× 大西, 健司
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This article investigates the concept of “responsiveness” in relational rights theory through both philosophical theories and legal arguments. There exists the notion, behind the theory of children’s rights as relational rights, that although children might be inferior to adults in autonomy and ability to make rational judgments, they are still the subjects of independent thought and recognition, and able to take exception to the status-quo, while adults should bear the responsibility to respond conscientiously to children’s opinions. However, the tendency of contemporary societies to see children as the property of the state and parents seeing their children as people they can mold to fit a certain image could impede the realization of children’s rights through denial of their initiative and independence. According to Ya’ir Ronen, an Israeli scholar of children’s law, the theory of “the Other” advocated by Emmanuel Levinas, a French scholar of phenomenology, is the most effective way to overcome the above-mentioned view of the child. The most distinctive feature of Levinas’ theory is that although it considers “the Other” as an absolute difference to self, it still recognizes a moment of a kind of ethical relationship between self and “the Other.” This article, inspects the significance of Levinas’ theory on the discourse of children’s rights as relational rights, and considers both the validity and the limitations in the legal context of the concept of “responsiveness” defined by Ronen as an attempt to approach the suffering of the child as “the Other” and give him/her protection that can meet his/her authentic needs. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 一橋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||||||
| 日付 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2017-11-10 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| selfDOI | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15057/28964 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1347-0388 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1161370X | |||||||||
| 収録物名 | ||||||||||
| 収録物名 | 一橋法学 | |||||||||
| 巻 | ||||||||||
| 巻 | 16 | |||||||||
| 号 | ||||||||||
| 号 | 3 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 209 | |||||||||
| 終了ページ | ||||||||||
| 終了ページ | 263 | |||||||||
