WEKO3
アイテム
弁護人の効果的な援助を受ける権利
https://doi.org/10.15057/28726
https://doi.org/10.15057/287269636db1a-4ab6-4026-81d6-93fda71d7058
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
hogaku0160200330.pdf (1689174 bytes)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | デフォルトアイテムタイプ（フル）その２(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-11-07 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 弁護人の効果的な援助を受ける権利 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | The Right to the Effective Assistance of Counsel | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
田鎖, 麻衣子
× 田鎖, 麻衣子
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Article 37 (3) of the Constitution of Japan, modeled on the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, is widely believed to guarantee the defendant the right to the effective assistance of counsel. Despite such belief, Japanese courts have never applied the provision to actual cases in which individual defendants sought remedies for deprivation of their right to effective assistance. This article shows how the effective assistance guarantee of the Sixth Amendment developed over a century prior to Strickland v. Washington, a U.S. Supreme Court decision that establishes the standard for evaluating counsel’s ineffective performance, and identifies the Court’s understanding of the vital importance of the defense function that underlies the constitutional guarantee. The article also examines a series of Japanese Supreme Court decisions on the right to counsel and makes it clear that the Japanese Court does not regard defense counsel as a crucial player of the adversarial system, i.e., it does not share the same idea as the U.S. Supreme Court holds about the role of counsel as the foundation of the constitutional guarantee. Thus, establishment of the right to the effective assistance of counsel in Japanese courts requires a change of the judiciary’s basic attitude toward the defense function. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 一橋大学大学院法学研究科 | |||||||||
| 日付 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2017-07-10 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Issued | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| selfDOI | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15057/28726 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1347-0388 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1161370X | |||||||||
| 収録物名 | ||||||||||
| 収録物名 | 一橋法学 | |||||||||
| 巻 | ||||||||||
| 巻 | 16 | |||||||||
| 号 | ||||||||||
| 号 | 2 | |||||||||
| 開始ページ | ||||||||||
| 開始ページ | 33 | |||||||||
| 終了ページ | ||||||||||
| 終了ページ | 118 | |||||||||
